Reference list

The following references have been cited throughout the INCEPT resource:

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2014. Age Standard 1.7. Retrieved from:,%20Version%201.7

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2016 Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 3 – Non ABS structures. Retrieved from:

Australian Evaluation Society (AES), 2013. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of Evaluations. Retrieved from:

Australian Government Guidelines on the Recognition of Sex and Gender (2015). Retrieved from:

Brown A, 2016. Differences between Theory of Change and the Logic Model. Retrieved from:

Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health (CACSH), 2002. Partnership self-assessment tool questionnaire. Retrieved from:

Coffey, 2018. What is a Theory of Action? Retrieved from:

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Ethics Committee, 2018. Project Specific Guidelines. Retrieved from:

Ellsberg M and Potts A, 2018. Ethical considerations for research and evaluation on ending violence against women and girls. Retrieved from:

Funnel S & Rogers P (2011). Purposeful Program Theory. Effective Use of the Theories of Change and Logic Models, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA

Health Nexus, 2018. Partnership Essentials. Retrieved from:

Kania J & Kramer M, 2011. Collective Impact. Stanford Social review. Retrieved from:

Stevahn L & King J.A., 2016. Facilitating interactive evaluation practice: Engaging stakeholders constructively. In R.S Fierro, A. Schwartz & D.H. Smart (Eds), Evaluation and Facilitation. New Directions for Evaluation, 149, 67 – 80. Retreived from:

Morris A, Hegarty K & Humphreys C, 2012. Ethical and safe: Research with children about domestic violence. Research Ethics, 8(2) 125 – 139. Retrieved from:

NHMRC, 2007. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, 2007 (updated 2018). Retrieved from:

Noone, J. H., Marjolin, A., Skelton, L., Graham, K., Salignac, F., Powell, A. (2017). Collaboration Health Assessment Tool. Sydney: Centre for Social Impact. Retrieved from:

Our Watch 2015. Change the Story: a shared framework for the primary prevention of violence against women and their children. Retrieved from:

Our Watch, 2016. Community based prevention of violence against women and their children. A toolkit for practitioners. Retrieved from:

Our Watch, 2017, Counting On Change. A Guide to Prevention Monitoring. Retrieved from:

Our Watch, 2018. Changing the picture: A national resource to support the prevention of violence against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their children. Retrieved from:

Owen J, 2006. Program Evaluation: forms and approaches. Crows Nest, NSW, Allen & Unwin.

The Lowitja Institute, 2011. Ethics Hub. Available at:

Minkler M & Wallerstein N, 2008. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. From process to outcomes, 2nd Edn. Chapter 12: Issues in participatory evaluation, p199; Springett J & Wallerstein N . Retrieved from:

The Ohio Primary Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence & Sexual Violence Empowerment Evaluation Toolkit, 2011. Amy Bush Stevens, Sandra Ortega, Ohio Domestic Violence Network, Columbus, Ohio. Retrieved from:

Vic Health, 2011. The Partnerships Analysis Tool

Vic Health, 2015. Evaluating Victorian projects for the primary prevention of violence against women: A concise guide. Retrieved from:

Webster, K., Diemer, K., Honey, N., Mannix, S., Mickle, J., Morgan, J., Parkes, A., Politoff, V., Powell, A., Stubbs, J., & Ward, A. (2018). Australians’ attitudes to violence against women and gender equality. Findings from the 2017 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey (NCAS) (Research report, 03/2018). Sydney, NSW: ANROWS. Retrieved from:

W.K. Kellogg Foundation, 2017. The Step-by-Step Guide to Evaluation. How to become Savvy Evaluation Consumers. Retrieved from:

World Health Organisation (WHO) 2001. Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Retrieved from: